ArticleFrontiers in zoology2026
Drivers and functional consequences of covering in a pervasive marine grazer (green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis).
Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe circumpolar green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, exhibits a fascinating behaviour, termed "covering", which consists of coating the body with materials collected in the environment. The lack of a consensus about the drivers of covering in green sea urchin and their relative importance prevents accurate predictions about the frequency and intensity of the behaviour and its functional consequences in a globally changing ocean climate. We paired an experiment in an oscillatory wave tank with green sea urchins collected from an extensive sea urchin barren in southeastern Newfoundland (Canada), and a 3-mo survey of this barrens, to examine individual and interactive effects of wave action, light, sea urchin body size, and types of covering materials on sea urchin's displacement and covering.
resultsOur findings establish that covering in S. droebachiensis is: (a) predominantly controlled by hydrodynamic forces, with the existence of water current-induced covering tipping points; (b) ontogenetically determined, with a continuous inclination to cover in small individuals and a seasonal component to covering in larger individuals; (c) opportunistic, with multiple types of covering materials employed based on availability; and (d) functionally costly, as it significantly reduces mobility. We largely rule out the paradigm that light induces covering or at least clearly marginalize it as a trigger or effector. Our results and those of other studies of the behavioural repertoire of S. droebachiensis, are consistent with the notion that covering serves a complementary function to mitigation of hydrodynamic forces.
conclusionsWe propose that covering in S. droebachiensis primarily serves a mechanical protection function, whereby the species shields its body surface to protect its external sensory, defensive, and locomotory organs against physical contact with moving debris.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.