ArticleBMC medical education2026
Faculty-resident relationships, professional behaviors, and psychological safety: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical training happens in high-stress environments where patient safety is prioritized but trainees need to feel safe to express ideas, seek help, and admit mistakes without fear of judgment. Limited studies exist on how psychological safety manifests in residency programs, particularly in a non-Western context, where hierarchy is important. This study aims to evaluate the psychological safety of residents in clinical settings and examine its association with faculty-resident relationship quality and faculty professional behaviors. It also explores whether demographic characteristics and personality traits influence residents' perceptions of psychological safety.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among residents at a tertiary academic medical center in Lebanon. Data were collected using an online survey that included validated scales for psychological safety, faculty-resident relationship quality (JHLES-Faculty Relationship Subscale), and faculty professional behaviors. Personality traits were assessed using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Statistical analyses included descriptive measures, correlation analyses, multivariable regression models, and additional post-hoc exploratory factor and mediation analyses.
resultsA total of 204 residents participated in the study (response rate: 69.12%). Psychological safety scores were moderate (mean: 3.02 ± 0.40 on a 5-point scale). Faculty-resident relationship quality was consistently associated with psychological safety (p < 0.001). Faculty professional behaviors were positively associated with psychological safety (p < 0.001) but became statistically non-significant in mutually adjusted models including relationship quality. Exploratory analyses supported the conceptual distinction between the two constructs and suggested that faculty-resident relationship quality may account for part of the association between faculty professional behaviors and psychological safety. No statistically significant associations were found between psychological safety and trainees' demographic characteristics or personality traits.
conclusionThis study underscores the critical role of interpersonal dynamics in fostering psychological safety within hierarchical clinical settings. While professional behaviors remain important, meaningful faculty engagement and mentorship may play a more central role in promoting a psychologically safe learning environment. Future longitudinal work should explore interventions to improve these relationships with particular attention to communication styles and feedback mechanisms that foster psychological safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.