ReviewBMC veterinary research2026
Canine mammary tumors: a bibliometric and visualized analysis from 2009 to 2025.
Review in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCanine mammary tumors (CMTs) are the most common neoplasms in intact female dogs. Although the number of publications on CMTs has increased steadily over recent decades, a comprehensive overview of the knowledge structure, research hotspots, and evolutionary trends in this field is still lacking.
methodsPublications related to CMTs were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection without restrictions on language or document type. Bibliometric and visualization analyses were conducted using CiteSpace (version 6.3.1) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.20). Co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence networks were constructed to identify influential countries, institutions, authors, core journals, research themes, and emerging trends.
resultsThe annual number of publications on CMTs showed a long-term increasing trend and has remained relatively stable in recent years, indicating a mature research stage. Brazil, the United States, and Italy were the most productive and influential countries, forming the core of the international collaboration network. A limited number of institutions and author groups dominated the field, with strong intra-group collaboration. Keyword and co-citation analyses revealed that histopathology, molecular expression, prognosis constitute the central research themes. Temporal and burst analyses indicated a shift from descriptive pathology toward molecular characterization, prognostic evaluation, reflecting the increasing depth and complexity of research in this field.
conclusionsResearch on CMTs has evolved from morphology-based studies to increasingly molecular and clinically oriented approaches. This bibliometric analysis clarifies the intellectual structure and developmental trajectory of the field and provides a systematic reference for future research on CMTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.