Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216025›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2026

Enhanced genetic diagnosis in early pregnancy loss: an integrated approach using CNV-Seq and STR genotyping.

Zhiying Zhang, Chunying Ren, Yuhui Wang, Jia Peng, Yuanhang Zhu, Yueli Wu, Chongyang Zhu, Xueyin Cui, Yaming Liu, Jian Zhao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhiying ZhangMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Chunying RenDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuhui WangMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Jia PengMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuanhang ZhuMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Yueli WuMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Chongyang ZhuMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Xueyin CuiMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Yaming LiuMedical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China.
Jian Zhao *Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, BioClinicum, Stockholm, Sweden. jian.zhao@ki.se.
Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg *Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Laboratory of Translational Fertility Preservation, BioClinicum, Stockholm, Sweden. kenny.rodriguez-wallberg@ki.se.
Ling Liu *Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China. liuling@zzu.edu.cn.

Funding

2025 Science and Technology Development Plan of Henan Province 〔2025〕23d Karolinska Institutet research grants 2020-00339Stockholm County Council ALF-grants 20160626the 14th Five-Year Plan "Reproductive Health and Protection of Maternal and Child Health" priority project 241111311300the National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2703301the Swedish Research Council Grants MH 2023-01872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChromosomal abnormalities are a leading cause of early pregnancy loss (EPL). While copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) is gradually applied in clinical practice, its sensitivity for detecting triploidy and uniparental disomy (UPD) remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether integrating CNV-seq with short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping could improve diagnostic performance in EPL.

methodsIn this study, 572 EPL samples were examined using CNV-seq combined with STR genotyping to detect chromosomal abnormalities, including triploidy and UPD, and to explore STR-based approaches for identifying the origin of abnormal chromosomes. Selected results were validated using karyotyping, CMA, MLPA, or FISH when necessary.

resultsChromosomal abnormalities were identified in 313 cases (54.7%), including autosomal aneuploidies (52.4%), CNVs (13.4%), sex chromosome aneuploidies (11.5%), multiple trisomies (3.5%), and mosaicism (3.5%). STR genotyping identified 38 additional cases (35 triploidy, 3 UPD) missed by CNV-seq, elevating the overall diagnostic yield by 6.6% (p < 0.05). Parental origin analysis revealed distinct distribution patterns: 69,XXY triploidies were predominantly of paternal origin (80.8%), whereas 69,XXX cases were mostly maternal (88.9%); all detected UPD cases were paternally derived. Among 134 common autosomal aneuploidies, maternal meiotic errors accounted for 91.8% of occurrences.

conclusionThe combination of CNV-seq and STR genotyping significantly improves the detection efficiency of triploidy, mosaicism, and other complex chromosomal anomalies, compensating for crucial limitations of conventional CNV-seq. Further STR-based parental tracing facilitates the identification of chromosomal aberration origins and reveals error formation patterns, thereby providing robust evidence for clinical etiological interpretation of early pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousDNA Copy Number VariationsMicrosatellite RepeatsAdultChromosome AberrationsFemaleGenotypeHumansKaryotypingPregnancyTriploidyUniparental DisomyChromosomal abnormalitiesCNV-seqMiscarriageSTR genotypingTriploidy

Identifiers

PMID42216025
PMCPMC13307679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.