ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Clinicopathological and molecular determinants of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: toward precision risk stratification.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are clinically heterogeneous, and conventional risk stratification based on tumor size, grade, and stage often fails to capture the full spectrum of biological behavior, especially among small (≤ 2 cm), non-functioning tumors where management remains controversial. MAIN BODY: Molecular profiling has revealed that the most frequently altered gene, MEN1, carries prognostic information beyond its mutation status. MEN1‑mutant tumors with recurrent loss of heterozygosity across multiple chromosomes follow an aggressive course, whereas those with isolated chromosome 11 loss remain indolent. Besides, the increasing multi-omic profiling has shown that DNA methylation and transcriptomic classification powerfully refine prognosis beyond traditional staging. Different subtypes of MEN1 and DAXX or ATRX co-mutated tumors exhibiting ALT-driven chromosomal instability and a high risk of recurrence even in sub-2 cm low-grade lesions. Metastatic disease the same genotype is associated with remarkably prolonged survival and superior response to PRRT. These studies provide a systems-level view of tumor biology in PanNETs and could aid in classifying distinct subtypes. Integrating these molecular layers with conventional clinicopathological parameters offers a refined framework for risk-adapted management. Hence, this review discusses the latest research findings that build upon the traditional classification protocols and examines the prognosis value of traditional and novel molecular targets. Furthermore, it mainly emphasizes the urgent need to incorporate not just only tumor size, stage and grade but also molecular characteristics as they offer valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity and is recognized as a critical aspect in risk stratification and guiding therapy. Perspectives and actionable suggestions have been addressed for the development of more accurate and reliable classification systems and predictive models in the future. In this context, this review has proposed an estimated risk stratification by integrating clinicopathological-molecular findings and has suggested risk-adapted management, which requires further validation.
conclusionOverall, integrating molecular features, such as MEN1 and DAXX or ATRX mutation patterns, ALT status, and multi-omic classifier with traditional clinicopathological parameters is essential to resolve the biological heterogeneity of PanNETs and to enable precise, risk-adapted clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.