Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215973›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Why are rural hospitals closing in the U.S.? Predictors identified using explainable machine learning.

Kiruthika Balakrishnan, Tesfamariam M Abuhay, Hana E Hinkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiruthika BalakrishnanNational Center for Rural Health Professions, University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, IL, 61107, USA. bkiruthi@uic.edu.
Tesfamariam M Abuhay *Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Hana E Hinkle *National Center for Rural Health Professions, University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, IL, 61107, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRural hospital closures in the U.S. reduce access to essential healthcare services and worsen health and economic outcomes in rural communities. This study uses national longitudinal data and explainable machine learning (XML) to identify and interpret risk factors of rural hospital closures. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of U.S. rural hospitals using national datasets from 2011 to 2022, integrating hospital-level financial, operational, policy, population, and community data. Longitudinal feature engineering and statistical summarization were performed, class imbalance and multicollinearity were addressed using random undersampling and variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis, and an XGBoost classifier was trained using stratified three-fold cross-validation and Optuna for hyperparameter tuning. Model explainability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsAmong 2,683 rural hospitals, 139 (5.2%) closed during the study period. The model achieved a recall of 86%, accuracy of 75%, and an AUC of 89%. The key variables linked to closure risk are sustained financial weakness and volatility (e.g., total margin, variability in return on equity, and current ratio), operational instability (low patient volume and variability in bed-days available), policy context (e.g., years since Medicaid expansion), and community context, including sociodemographic characteristics of the service area (e.g., proportion of Black or African American residents), which may reflect underlying structural and socioeconomic conditions rather than direct predictors or causal drivers of closure. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that the risk of closure of rural hospitals reflects accumulated long-term financial and operational instability, as well as policy and community context, rather than short-term distress, highlighting the value of longitudinal and explainable modeling approaches.

conclusionLongitudinal data integrated into XML provides a practical approach for early warning systems that enable proactive monitoring and timely interventions, particularly for hospitals serving historically underserved communities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Health Facility ClosureHospitals, RuralMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesEarly warning systemsExplainable machine learningHospital closure risk factorsLongitudinally derived featuresRural hospital closures

Identifiers

PMID42215973
PMCPMC13430831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.