ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Accommodation-induced biometric changes in ciliary muscle, trabecular meshwork, and Schlemm's canal: comparison of eyes in high myopia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate accommodation-induced changes in the ciliary muscle (CM), Schlemm's canal (SC), and trabecular meshwork (TM) in eyes with and without high myopia, and to assess the associations among these structures during accommodation.
methods116 eyes from 57 healthy control (HC) and 59 high myopia (HM) were assessed across two experiments. In the first experiment, pilocarpine-induced accommodation was applied to 78 eyes, while in the second, a -5 diopter (D) accommodative stimulus was used on 38 eyes. Anterior segment images were captured via swept-source optical coherence tomography before and after each accommodation stimulus. Measurements included the maximum thickness of CM and the anterior length of CM, the length of TM, and the area of SC. Statistical analyses evaluated group differences and correlations.
resultsDrug-induced and - 5D stimulation increased the maximum thickness of CM and the area of SC's levels while decreasing the anterior length of CM's levels. In the HC group, the length of TM was larger in the accommodative state, mediating the relationship between changes in the maximum thickness of CM and the area of SC. Conversely, these changes and correlations in the length of TM were insignificant in HM eyes. The length of TM increased with axial length and elongation in the anterior length of CM across all subjects; however, accommodation-related changes diminished as axial length (AL) and the anterior length of CM increased. Causal mediation analysis demonstrated that the anterior length of CM mediated the relationship between AL and the length of TM elongation.
conclusionsIn two trials, accommodation-induced changes in the CM, TM, and SC were observed in eyes with or without HM, with reduced TM and SC response in HM. Differences in CM, TM, and SC behavior during accommodation between the HC and HM groups suggest that CM contraction may reshape the aqueous humor outflow channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.