Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215971›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Perspectives on the impact of the inclusion of non-medical practitioners in the skill mixed staffing teams of English emergency departments: a qualitative study.

Vari M Drennan, Francesca Taylor, Mary Halter, Jonathan Gabe, Heather Gage, Heather Jarman, Sakshi Adhav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vari M DrennanFaculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, KT2 7LF, UK. v.drennan@kingston.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-5185
Francesca TaylorFaculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, KT2 7LF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-6003
Mary HalterFaculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, KT2 7LF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-0621
Jonathan GabeThe School of Law and Social Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-4935
Heather GageSurrey Health Economics Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2049-9406
Heather JarmanSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW17 0QT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-3291
Sakshi AdhavFaculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, KT2 7LF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-9251

Funding

National Institute for Health & Care Research NIHR131356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Departments internationally have struggled to meet increased patient demand in the context of staffing shortages, particularly doctors. Some countries have employed non-medical practitioners (NMPs), such as advanced nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who undertake some of the clinical work of the doctors across the range of patients attending, not just those with minor injuries. This study investigated the perceived impact of skill mixed staffing, which included established NMPs in emergency departments, in the period post pandemic when patient attendances were particularly high.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted and thematically analysed in six emergency departments with 35 patients and 37 staff members between September 2023- June 2024.

resultsPatient participants offered views of positive impact of teams with NMPs in the context of long waiting times but were concerned that all were appropriately trained, supervised and that they were informed of their role. Staff participants also perceived a mix of positive and challenging impacts on aspects of service efficiency, safety, effectiveness and acceptability. Those participants who reported the most positive impacts on patient experience could also identify some challenging issues, for example on the workload of the senior clinical decision makers in supervising both NMPs and resident doctors. Conversely those who reported the most negative impacts, such as potential loss of training opportunities and jobs for doctors, also identified some positive impacts on the service efficiency and staff experience.

conclusionsThe deployment of NMPs in ED/UTCs requires careful planning so the perceived efficiency benefits can be maximised without jeopardising quality of care, safety, and staff experience. Consideration of underlying explanatory mechanisms led to theorisation of the concept of balance as important to the optimal skill-mix within emergency department staffing. The findings suggest that the elements that require attention from clinicians and managers within the complex system of skill-mix staffing in ED/UTCs include balance between patient volume and staffing, between numbers and capacity of senior clinical decision makers and junior clinical decision makers; and between provision of service and provision of training.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalNurse PractitionersPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysician AssistantsAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchAdvanced clinical practitionersEmergency departmentHealth workforceNon-medical practitionersPhysician assistants/associatesQualitative interviewsSkill-mix

Identifiers

PMID42215971
PMCPMC13430847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.