ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Beyond prediction: explainable machine learning for ferritin estimation from complete blood count.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSerum ferritin is a primary marker of body iron stores; however, its diagnostic utility is limited by cost and non-specific elevation during inflammatory states. This study aimed to develop and validate explainable machine learning (ML) models to estimate ferritin status using only widely available and cost-effective complete blood count (CBC) and demographic parameters.
methodsThis prospective study analyzed 12,450 adult laboratory records. To ensure ferritin reflected true iron status, cases with inflammation (elevated white blood cell count or erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were excluded. A balanced dataset of 7,200 samples was used to train five supervised ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), for both binary classification and regression tasks. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to evaluate global feature importance.
resultsThe ANN model achieved the best classification performance, with an area under the curve of 0.837 and an F1-score of 0.760 in discriminating low ferritin levels (< 30 ng/mL) from normal values. Although the regression model demonstrated a moderate global R² of 0.32, it showed higher predictive accuracy in lower ferritin ranges critical for diagnosing iron deficiency. SHAP analysis revealed Sex, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, and Red Cell Distribution Width as the most influential predictors, consistent with iron-restricted erythropoiesis.
conclusionML models based solely on routine hemogram data provide a reliable, zero-cost screening approach for iron deficiency. The integration of explainable AI enhances clinical credibility and supports implementation as an accessible decision support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.