ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Outcomes of 72-hour emergency department return visits requiring hospital admission in older adults: a nationally representative analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adult Emergency department disposition decisions are uniquely challenging. Providers must balance the risk of admission (delirium, deconditioning, iatrogenic complications, cost) with the risk of discharging evolving illness leading to potentially worse outcomes. National-level data on return visit admissions among older adults (RVAs)-hospitalizations occurring within 72 hours of an emergency department (ED) treat-and-release visit- and their outcomes in this population remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), analyzing data from 1/1/2007-12/31/2022. We included ED visits for adults aged ≥65 resulting in hospital admission and excluded direct admissions to procedural or intensive care units. RVAs were defined as hospital admissions preceded by a treat-and-release ED visit at the same facility within 72 hours. Comparator group comprised index ED admissions to general inpatient floor or ward units, excluding procedural and critical care destinations. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and nursing home placement. We performed multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, race, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), and comorbid conditions. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported.
resultsAmong the sampled visits representing 3,375,062 national admissions, 206,211 (6.1%) were RVAs. In-hospital mortality was 4.0% for RVAs vs 2.3% for index visit admissions (p=0.082). After adjustment, RVA was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (aOR 2.72; p=0.028). No significant differences were seen in hospital length of stay or new nursing home placement. The five most common diagnoses in RVAs were infectious: sepsis, pneumonia, COVID-19, cellulitis, and urinary tract infection.
conclusionsIn a nationally representative sample of older adult patients, 72-hour RVA were associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to index visit admissions to the floor. Although this difference was not statistically significant in unadjusted analyses, multivariable regression revealed a significant independent association. These findings should be interpreted as a potential risk signal rather than evidence of causation, suggesting that short delays in inpatient-level care may have meaningful consequences for older adults, particularly with infectious conditions. Future work to delineate subgroups and causal pathways will be essential to improving ED risk stratification, disposition decision-making, and post-ED care transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.