ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Managing medications together: a qualitative study of collaboration between primary and secondary caregivers of older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedication management is among the most complex tasks faced by dependent older adults and requires substantial physical and cognitive effort from their family caregivers. Although prior research has described the roles of primary caregivers (PCGs) and secondary caregivers (SCGs) in caring for older adults, limited attention has been paid to how these caregivers collaborate in daily caregiving activities. This study aimed to explore PCGs' experiences of collaborating with SCGs in managing medications for older adults and to understand the contextual factors that shape this collaboration.
methodsUsing a qualitative descriptive design, this study analyzed 28 semi-structured interview transcripts from PCGs. A combination of deductive and inductive content analysis was used to identify medication management activities performed by PCGs and SCGs, as well as the factors shaping their collaboration. The findings were then integrated to categorize and characterize distinct collaboration styles for medication management.
resultsPrimary caregivers were predominantly adult children or children-in-law, who reported collaborating with SCGs including family members, paid home care aides, or both. Primary caregivers primarily handled medication management activities requiring higher cognitive effort, whereas SCGs often assisted with activities requiring greater physical effort and co-presence with care recipients. Two main categories emerged as shaping collaboration in medication management: (1) conferring decision-making authority and (2) positioning the SCG as an active or passive supporter. Contextual factors influencing collaboration were largely caregiver-related and included kinship ties between PCGs and SCGs, caregivers' knowledge of the care recipient's medications, geographic proximity to the care recipient, marital status, and employment status. Four distinct styles of collaboration between PCGs and SCGs were identified and categorized as Partnering, Operating, Bench-Playing, and Intervening.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into how multiple family caregivers collaborate to manage medications for older adults, highlighting differences in task responsibility allocation and degrees of collaboration. Future research should systematically investigate the social and demographic factors shaping these collaborative strategies to inform the development of tailored interventions that better support caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.