Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215842›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Enhancing propensity score analysis with data missing not at random: Introducing dual-forest proximity imputation.

Yongseok Lee, Walter L Leite

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongseok LeeDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, Hanley Hall (Room 356), 1202 Mitch Daniels Blvd, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA. lee5321@purdue.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-4673
Walter L LeiteSchool of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7655-5668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers using propensity score analysis (PSA) to estimate treatment effects using secondary data may have to handle data that are missing not at random (MNAR). Existing methods for PSA with MNAR data use logistic regression to model the missing data mechanisms, thus requiring manual specification of functional forms, and are difficult to implement with a large number of covariates. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes alternatives to existing methods by replacing logistic regression with a random forest. Also, it introduces the dual-forest proximity imputation method, which leverages two types of proximity matrices of random forest techniques and incorporates missingness pattern information in each matrix. Results from a Monte Carlo simulation show dual-forest proximity imputation's enhanced bias reduction with various types of MNAR mechanisms as compared to existing and alternative methods. A case study is also provided using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (Enders, 1979) (NLSY79).

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLogistic ModelsMonte Carlo MethodRandom ForestDual-forest proximity imputationMissing not at randomMultiple imputationPropensity score analysisRandom forests

Identifiers

PMID42215842
PMCPMC13221353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.