ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Implementing multiple implicit association tests in Qualtrics: A guide and demonstration using balanced identity design theory.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in implicit processes, such as attitudes and identities, has grown in behavioral sciences since Greenwald and colleagues (1998) developed and introduced the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The IAT was developed to measure these processes, which has become more accessible with the popularity of Qualtrics as a data collection tool, especially through methods and code provided by Carpenter et al. (2019). They demonstrated how to construct a single IAT for use on the Qualtrics platform, providing research resources for creating IATs to examine concept-pair associations. However, there is no guidance on constructing multiple IATs on survey software platforms for research that requires two or more IATs in a single study. This paper extends Carpenter et al.'s (2019) work by outlining the process of developing, implementing, and utilizing multiple IATs within a single Qualtrics survey. We provide a tutorial using examples from our research using the Balanced Identity Design (BID) framework, including step-by-step written and visual instructions and templates, instructions for planning and building multiple IATs and dynamically presenting them in a single Qualtrics survey and code for processing IAT data. We also demonstrate the utility of the multiple IAT approach by reporting a short study utilizing BID theory wherein we measure implicit racial/ethnic identity, STEM identity, and race/ethnicity-STEM associations in a single study via three IATs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.