ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
The climber's finger: imaging of non-pulley finger injuries.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climbing is a rapidly growing sport that subjects the fingers to intense mechanical stress, predisposing athletes to a wide spectrum of injuries beyond the well-recognized flexor pulley lesions. Non-pulley-related finger injuries, although often underrecognized, can impair performance, cause chronic pain, and lead to long-term complications such as osteoarthritis, cyst formation, or tendon rupture. These injuries involve flexor tendons, collateral ligaments, volar plates, joint capsules, extensor mechanisms, lumbrical muscles, epiphyseal growth plates in adolescents, digital nerves, and palmar fascia. Multimodal imaging plays a central role in diagnosis, characterization, and follow-up of finger injuries. Conventional radiography is first-line for fractures, avulsions, osteophytes, and epiphyseal injuries. High-frequency ultrasound offers dynamic assessment of tendons, ligaments, muscles, nerves, and fascial structures, detecting edema, tears, or hypervascularity. MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast, delineating occult fractures, tendon pathology, capsular inflammation, and chronic degenerative changes, while CT or CBCT is reserved for complex osseous injuries. Imaging not only identifies acute lesions but also evaluates chronic adaptations such as cortical hypertrophy, subchondral sclerosis, joint widening, and dorsal osteophytes. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the anatomy, biomechanics, and imaging features of non-pulley-related digital injuries in climbers, emphasizing sport-specific mechanisms, including considerations for epiphyseal fractures in adolescent athletes. Recognition of these injuries allows early intervention, targeted conservative or surgical management, and safe return to climbing. Radiologists and clinicians should integrate detailed anatomical knowledge, biomechanical understanding, and sport-specific stress patterns to optimize functional outcomes, prevent long-term complications, and guide follow-up in both elite and recreational climbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42215818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.