ReviewActa neurochirurgica2026
The top 100 most cited peer-reviewed publications on global neurosurgery: Mapping research trends and gaps over four decades.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to highlight the landscape of global neurosurgery (GNS) literature through a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited peer-reviewed publications. The objectives were to identify publication trends, citation patterns, authorship, and collaboration networks within GNS research over the past four decades.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted using Google Scholar and the Web of Science (WoS) database to identify articles related to GNS published within the last 40 years. The top 100 most cited articles were selected for analysis. Bibliometric evaluation was performed using VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio to assess trends in publication, authorship, citation, and country contribution, including those from lower-middle-income and low-income countries (LMIC/LIC).
resultsThe 100 most-cited GNS publications, spanning 2000-2023, included 811 co-authors from 61 countries and were published across 40 journals, with 71% appearing in nine leading journals. Publication output after 2012 accounted for 68% and showed a significant increase compared to the previous period (χ
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and distribution of leading GNS research. The steady rise in publications underscores increasing world-wide engagement in addressing disparities in neurosurgical care. However, persistent underrepresentation from LMIC/LIC highlights a growth opportunity. Strengthening inclusive global partnerships and research capacity in resource-constrained settings will be essential to advance sustainability and overall GNS goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.