ArticleJournal of human genetics2026
Implementation of comprehensive genome analysis in clinical sequencing at an academic institution.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the increasing number of diseases for which causative genes have been identified, we are facing the need for implementing comprehensive genome sequence analysis as a molecular diagnostic system for patients with hereditary diseases in daily clinical practice. We established a laboratory-developed test (LDT) with the implementation of whole-exome sequence analysis (WES) as the clinical sequencing system at an academic institution. WES was conducted on 81 patients with suspected hereditary disorders referred from clinical departments in our hospital from 2021 to 2024. Target genes were selected on the basis of the clinical presentations of the patients and expanded when necessary. Additional analyses, including copy number and zygosity analyses, further improved the diagnostic accuracy. The overall diagnostic yield was 42.0%, excluding four patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis confirmed as wild-type ATTR Amyloidosis (ATTRwt). High diagnostic yields were associated with the presence of family histories. Secondary findings were searched in 73 patients, and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were disclosed to three patients, leading to their subsequent clinical follow-up. Internal and external quality controls ensured analytical reliability. This study demonstrates that the implementation of LDT-based comprehensive genome analysis is highly useful in daily clinical practice, achieving a high diagnostic yield comparable to those in previous large-scale studies; furthermore, the clinical sequencing seamlessly harmonizes the research-level investigations, providing highly valuable results. Broader insurance coverage will be essential for expanding equitable access to the genetic tests based on comprehensive genome sequence analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.