SynthesisBrain structure & function2026
Consistent neural evidence to support novelty and appropriateness processing for creative thinking: a coordinated meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation.
Synthesis in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Creative thinking is characterized by novelty and appropriateness. Previous research has focused on consistent neural mechanisms across specific creative tasks, leaving the general brain bases of novelty and appropriateness unclear. Therefore, this study used activation likelihood estimation to identify coherent neural activity underlying these two features. After robust selection, forty studies were recruited for novelty analysis, while fifteen were for appropriateness. Two single meta-analyses were performed, followed by contrast and conjunction analyses. Results revealed that novelty processing involved the fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, precuneus, inferior parietal lobule, precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. Appropriateness processing engaged the superior occipital gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and medial frontal gyrus. These findings offer robust evidence for understanding independent neural roles that support novelty and appropriateness in creativity. And we also proposed a newly-developed dual model to better understand how these brain regions might interact to serve creative thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42215782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.