Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215782›Full record

SynthesisBrain structure & function2026

Consistent neural evidence to support novelty and appropriateness processing for creative thinking: a coordinated meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation.

Jiabao Lin, Yuanyun He, Siying Zhang, Lei Mo, Changyi Kuang, Yajue Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiabao Lin *Department of Psychology, School of Public Health and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510006, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanyun He *Department of Psychology, School of Public Health and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510006, Guangzhou, China.
Siying ZhangDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 510006, Guangzhou, China.
Lei MoCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, 510631, Guangzhou, China.
Changyi KuangInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany. c.kuang@fz-juelich.de.
Yajue ChenSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, 510006, Guangzhou, China. chenyajuecherry@163.com.

Funding

the Educational Science Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2025GXJK0083the General Project of Humanities and Social Science Research, Ministry of Education 22YJC190013the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400924the Philosophy and Social Science Project of Guangdong Province GD23CXL01the Project of Guangzhou Philosophies and Social Sciences 2023GZGJ194the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China 2025A04J4354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creative thinking is characterized by novelty and appropriateness. Previous research has focused on consistent neural mechanisms across specific creative tasks, leaving the general brain bases of novelty and appropriateness unclear. Therefore, this study used activation likelihood estimation to identify coherent neural activity underlying these two features. After robust selection, forty studies were recruited for novelty analysis, while fifteen were for appropriateness. Two single meta-analyses were performed, followed by contrast and conjunction analyses. Results revealed that novelty processing involved the fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, precuneus, inferior parietal lobule, precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. Appropriateness processing engaged the superior occipital gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and medial frontal gyrus. These findings offer robust evidence for understanding independent neural roles that support novelty and appropriateness in creativity. And we also proposed a newly-developed dual model to better understand how these brain regions might interact to serve creative thinking.

Indexed as

BrainCreativityThinkingBrain MappingHumansLikelihood FunctionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAppropriatenessCreativityMeta-analysisNeural mechanismNovelty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.