Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215733›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Sexual Communication: Assessing the Validity of Three Scales that Reflect In-Person, Text-Based, and Voice Chat-Based Frequency of Communication Among U.S. Young Adults.

Chelly Maes, Judith Kotiuga, Anne Julia Maheux

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chelly MaesFaculté de Lettres, Traduction, et Communication, Département des Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication, Université libre de Bruxelles, 30 avenue Antoine Depage, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium. chelly.maes@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-2629
Judith KotiugaDépartement de Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, PQ, Canada.
Anne Julia MaheuxDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, The Winston National Center on Technology Use, Brain, and Psychological Development, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual communication is a key factor influencing sexuality development, sexual health and well-being, and relationship satisfaction. Existing self-report instruments of frequency of sexual communication between partners miss consideration of communication across multiple channels. As digital media have become an integral part of young adults' sexual lives, there is a need for precise measurements of sexual communication that distinguish online and offline contexts across diverse topics. This study addressed these gaps by developing and validating three self-report sexual communication scales split by modality, measuring sexual communication frequency across in-person, text-based, and voice chat-based channels (e.g., phone call, video chat). In Study 1, exploratory factor analyses (N = 537 U.S. young adults, ages 18-21; 57.17% female, 34.83% male; 49.91% heterosexual) revealed four, four, and three factors for in-person, text-based, and voice chat-based sexual communication, respectively, each representing different sexual communication topics (e.g., sexual desire, initiation, boundaries). Factor structures, internal consistency, and construct and incremental validity were upheld in Study 2 (N = 365 U.S. young adults ages 18-21; M age = 19.87;57.8% female, 38.9% male; 71.2% heterosexual), and the scales were found to be invariant across gender and relationship type. These scales provide a rigorous tool for examining sexual communication topics across channels, offering valuable insights for academic and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

CommunicationSexual BehaviorAdolescentDigital MediaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesText MessagingUnited StatesYoung AdultDigital mediaSexual communicationSexual orientationYoung adults

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.