ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Sexual Communication: Assessing the Validity of Three Scales that Reflect In-Person, Text-Based, and Voice Chat-Based Frequency of Communication Among U.S. Young Adults.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual communication is a key factor influencing sexuality development, sexual health and well-being, and relationship satisfaction. Existing self-report instruments of frequency of sexual communication between partners miss consideration of communication across multiple channels. As digital media have become an integral part of young adults' sexual lives, there is a need for precise measurements of sexual communication that distinguish online and offline contexts across diverse topics. This study addressed these gaps by developing and validating three self-report sexual communication scales split by modality, measuring sexual communication frequency across in-person, text-based, and voice chat-based channels (e.g., phone call, video chat). In Study 1, exploratory factor analyses (N = 537 U.S. young adults, ages 18-21; 57.17% female, 34.83% male; 49.91% heterosexual) revealed four, four, and three factors for in-person, text-based, and voice chat-based sexual communication, respectively, each representing different sexual communication topics (e.g., sexual desire, initiation, boundaries). Factor structures, internal consistency, and construct and incremental validity were upheld in Study 2 (N = 365 U.S. young adults ages 18-21; M age = 19.87;57.8% female, 38.9% male; 71.2% heterosexual), and the scales were found to be invariant across gender and relationship type. These scales provide a rigorous tool for examining sexual communication topics across channels, offering valuable insights for academic and clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42215733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.