ArticleCommunications biology2026
National-scale acoustic monitoring of avian biodiversity and migration.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bird species occurrence dataset from passive audio recordings across dense urban areas in Gothenburg, Sweden.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Impact of transfer learning methods and dataset characteristics on generalization in birdsong classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Billions of birds migrate annually, triggered by endogenous behaviors but also by ecoclimatic drivers which are shifting with climate change. These dynamics play out over huge spatiotemporal scales, making monitoring of phenology challenging with traditional biodiversity survey approaches. In this study, over a complete spring migration season (April through June), we collected 37,429 hours of audio from 28 networked sensors in forests across Norway using a nationwide passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) system. We applied an open-source detection algorithm to automatically classify bird vocalizations; through expert validation we found the algorithm classified 57 species (14 full migrants) with at least 80% precision. Using these automated detections, we developed regional arrival curves for three common migratory passerines: Willow Warbler, Common Chiffchaff, and Spotted Flycatcher. We then demonstrate that PAM detections can be used to train audio species distribution models that map how species vocalization probability changes across Norway during spring migration. Lastly, we discuss how PAM can complement existing manual surveys to support the design and implementation of effective policy and conservation measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.