Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215705›Full record

ReviewPlant reproduction2026

Basis of apomixis in flowering plants - state of the art and research perspectives.

Agnieszka Barbara Springer, Krystyna Musiał

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnieszka Barbara SpringerThe Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, Cracow, 30-239, Poland. a.springer@ifr-pan.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-9269-5115
Krystyna MusiałDepartment of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, Cracow, 30-387, Poland. k.musial@uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-1585-6226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most angiosperm plants, seeds are produced through a sexual process. Some angiosperms have developed an alternative reproductive strategy termed apomixis which involves producing seeds without the key steps of sexual development (i.e. meiosis, fertilization) and results in progeny genetically identical to the mother plant. Despite significant research advances, the evolutionary origin and molecular nature of apomixis remain unclear. Recent findings suggest that apomixis may have emerged from a sexual pathway deregulated by genetic and epigenetic modifications and stress signals (both endogenous and exogenous) that led to the alteration or omission of selected stages of sexual development. Apomixis, as a natural phenomenon that enables clonal reproduction by seeds, is a desirable trait with great potential in plant breeding, especially in terms of preserving hybrid vigor and gene combinations of elite phenotypes over subsequent generations. Notwithstanding, apomixis does not occur in major crops and therefore research programs focus on how to introgress, induce, or mimic apomixis in agronomically significant sexual species. The present review outlines the history of research on apomixis in flowering plants, its mechanisms, and a summary of the latest and most impactful research advances that may pave the way for the introduction of apomixis to sexually reproducing crops. The reader's attention is also drawn to the partially explained issue of intercellular communication in ovules during early apomictic processes in the context of the cell wall's changed chemical composition in cells that enter the apomictic developmental pathway.

Indexed as

ApomixisMagnoliopsidaSeedsApomeiosisClonal seedsMutantsOvuleParthenogenesisPlant breeding

Identifiers

PMID42215705
PMCPMC13221432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.