ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Interventional radiological treatment of uterine fibroids and pelvic congestion syndrome for pain reduction].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic pelvic pain in women is often multifactorial and associated with a marked impairment in quality of life. Among the most common structural causes are symptomatic uterine fibroids and pelvic congestion syndrome.
objectivesThis review provides an overview of interventional radiological treatment options for both conditions, with a focus on pain reduction and clinical effectiveness. MATERIALS AND
methodsCurrent reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical studies on uterine artery embolization (UAE), magnetic resonance (MR-)high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and radiofrequency and microwave ablation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids, as well as pelvic vein embolization for pelvic congestion syndrome, were summarized.
resultsIn uterine fibroids, UAE, HIFU/MR-HIFU, and thermal ablation techniques improve symptoms and quality of life. UAE is particularly well established for multiple and large fibroids, whereas HIFU and thermal ablation techniques appear especially suitable for selected, more focal lesions. In pelvic congestion syndrome, meta-analyses demonstrate a marked and sustained reduction in pain following pelvic vein embolization.
conclusionInterventional radiological procedures represent effective organ-preserving treatment options for both conditions. While the analgesic effect in pelvic congestion syndrome is usually demonstrated directly by pain scales, in fibroid therapies it is generally assessed only indirectly through symptom and quality-of-life parameters. Standardized assessment of pain could help to define patient-relevant benefit more clearly in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42215693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.