Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215688›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026

Data analysis for behavioral medicine: an introduction to the special issue.

Mauricio Garnier-Villarreal, Alexander Schoemann, Manshu Yang

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauricio Garnier-VillarrealVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alexander SchoemannEast Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA. schoemanna@ecu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-8798
Manshu YangVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods and theory are deeply intertwined in behavioral research: theoretical developments lead to the need for new methods, and methodological innovations, in turn, open the door to new theoretical insights. To continue advancing research in behavior medicine, new methods need to be developed and implemented. At the same time, data collected in this field are becoming increasingly complex, requiring quantitative approaches that are both rigorous and accessible to analyze them effectively. In this Special Issue we have included eighteen papers that highlight developments and applications of quantitative methods for behavioral medicine. Across the papers we identified six main themes: mixture modeling, longitudinal modeling, location-scale models, methods for randomized trials and causal inference, methods using Bayesian inference, and estimating complex, nonlinear relationships.

Indexed as

Behavioral MedicineData AnalysisBayes TheoremHumansBayesianCausalityLocation-Scale ModelsLongitudinal ModelsMixture ModelsQuantitative MethodsResearch Methods

Identifiers

PMID42215688
PMCPMC13253705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.