ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing age-structured sampling for estimating the seroconversion rate in malaria seroepidemiology: a simulation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seroprevalence and the seroconversion rate (SCR) are key indicators of malaria burden, particularly in low-transmission settings. Optimizing age-based sampling may improve the efficiency and precision of SCR estimation, but this has not been systematically explored in malaria seroepidemiology. We employed Monte Carlo simulations to identify optimal age-based sampling strategies under varying assumptions by modifying (1) SCR, (2) seroreversion rate (SRR), and (3) whether SRR was known or unknown. Using the reverse catalytic model and its extension, we considered two transmission scenarios: a stable SCR and a reduction in SCR at a defined change point. Realistic ranges for SCR and SRR were selected based on previous reports, assuming serological responses to Plasmodium falciparum MSP1. In stable settings, sampling older individuals improved precision in low-transmission settings, whereas younger age groups were more informative in high-transmission settings when SRR was known. When SRR was unknown, sampling more younger individuals and maintaining a balanced age distribution yielded higher precision. Under changing transmission, sampling individuals born after the change point improved estimation of post-change SCR, while balanced sampling performed best when SRR was unknown. To illustrate the practical implications of these findings, we applied the framework to published malaria serological data from Sri Lanka. The original study employed an age distribution heavily skewed toward adults, resulting in reduced precision for the post-change SCR and limited statistical power to detect a change in transmission. Our simulations demonstrate that alternative age-based sampling strategies could substantially improve both precision and power under comparable conditions. These findings highlight the importance of careful sampling design in enhancing study efficiency, particularly in settings with limited personnel or financial resources, and emphasize that age-structured sampling strategies should be thoughtfully considered to ensure adequate precision when estimating SCR from a single cross-sectional malaria serological survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.