ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigation of microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of AA8011/TiB₂ composites for sustainable engineering applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the microstructure, mechanical properties, and fracture behaviour of AA8011 aluminium matrix composites reinforced with TiB₂ particles. The composites containing 0, 3, 6, and 9 wt% TiB₂ were fabricated using the stir casting technique under optimized processing conditions. Structural and phase characterization were carried out using X-ray diffraction (XRD), while microstructural evaluation was performed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Mechanical behaviour was assessed by tensile and Vickers microhardness testing. The XRD results confirmed the presence of aluminium matrix and TiB₂ reinforcement phases without the formation of undesirable intermetallic compounds, indicating good chemical stability during processing. Density analysis revealed improved densification and reduced void content with increasing reinforcement percentage. Mechanical characterization showed progressive enhancement in tensile strength and hardness with the addition of TiB₂ particles, although ductility decreased at higher reinforcement levels. Microstructural observations demonstrated relatively uniform particle distribution and grain refinement, while fractographic analysis indicated a transition from ductile fracture in the base alloy to mixed ductile-quasi-brittle fracture behaviour in the reinforced composites. The results demonstrate that TiB₂ reinforcement effectively improves the overall mechanical performance of AA8011 aluminium composite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.