ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid AI vision model for single-camera tracking of rehabilitation exercises: a proof of concept in clinical settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate measurement of range of motion (ROM) during physical rehabilitation is traditionally achieved using goniometers or multi-camera, marker-based motion capture systems. The latter, while highly accurate, require specialised laboratory infrastructure, are costly, and are unsuitable for home-based use. There is growing interest in markerless, camera-based alternatives that leverage artificial intelligence (AI) for joint angle estimation. This study presents a preliminary proof-of-concept evaluation of a hybrid AI vision system, combining the MediaPipe Pose framework (version 0.8.9.1, Full model variant) with a Mamdani-type fuzzy inference system, for joint angle estimation and exercise repetition counting using a single consumer-grade camera. Fourteen healthy adult rehabilitation staff members performed three exercises (elbow flexion, knee extension, and hip external rotation) simultaneously recorded by the proposed AI system and by a reference optical motion capture system (C-Motion Visual3D™, 14 calibrated infrared cameras, 53 retro-reflective markers). Reliability was assessed using two-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC[Formula: see text]) with absolute agreement. Individual-measure ICC values ranged from poor to good across joints and conditions (range: 0.005-0.68). The highest reliability was observed for the right hip external rotation ROM (individual ICC [Formula: see text]; average ICC [Formula: see text], 95% CI: 0.63-0.89). Several measures showed poor reliability, including the right elbow flexion ROM (individual ICC [Formula: see text]) and the minimum angle of the left hip external rotation (individual ICC [Formula: see text]). Confidence intervals were wide throughout. This proof of concept demonstrates that a single-camera AI system can capture general trends in joint angles during simple rehabilitation exercises in healthy adults under controlled conditions. However, reliability is inconsistent and frequently poor, and the system has not been evaluated in patient populations with pathological movement patterns. These findings do not support clinical deployment at this stage. Substantial further development and validation in patient cohorts are required before clinical or home-based use can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.