Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215661›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Abies grandis (Douglas ex. D. Don) Lindl. productivity in central European provenance trial reflects populations' adaptation to seed source climate.

Daniel J Chmura, Jacek Banach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel J ChmuraInstitute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ul. Parkowa 5, 62-035, Kórnik, Poland. djchmura@man.poznan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-1472
Jacek BanachDepartment of Ecology and Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-8247

Funding

subsidy from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland to the University of Agriculture in Krakow SUB/040012/D019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing climatic changes and their future projections indicate that native conifer tree species would lose their suitable climatic niches in central Europe by the end of century. Maintaining productivity and carbon sequestration capacity in managed forests may require focusing on alternative tree species, including non-native ones. In this study we investigated productivity traits of seven grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas ex. D. Don) Lindl.) provenances at two common garden testing sites in Poland to examine the extent at which variation could be attributed to climatic adaptation, and to the response to climatic transfer distances. Productivity per unit land area varied significantly between two sites and among tested provenances. The observed patterns of variation pointed to increasing performance of populations with milder climate and more favorable climatic moisture availability at their origin, indicating adaptation of local populations. Seed sources from Vancouver Island, the Olympic Peninsula, and the Cascades of Washington should be prioritized for planting in conditions of central Europe. The use of grand fir provenances in afforestation and reforestation programs must be closely aligned with climatic matching, especially with respect to moisture availability, for maximizing productivity and enhancing structural diversity of managed forests in central Europe in a changing climate.

Indexed as

AbiesAdaptation, PhysiologicalClimateSeedsClimate ChangeEuropeForestsPolandTreesAdaptationBasal areaGrand firProvenanceSite matchingVolume

Identifiers

PMID42215661
PMCPMC13454443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.