ArticleScientific reports2026
Authorship identification for Chinese literature based on a pyramid deep bidirectional gated recurrent unit network with voting strategy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the author of given textual excerpts is a challenging and significant task in computational linguistics. In this paper, we propose a novel deep-learning model structured based on a Pyramid Deep Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (biGRU) network for authorship identification of Chinese literature. Our model introduces a hierarchical architecture where the output sequence of each GRU layer is progressively downsampled by an optimizable convolutional module before serving as the input for the subsequent layer. To enhance computational efficiency, we implement a parameter-sharing strategy across all layers. Furthermore, we incorporate a multi-level soft-voting mechanism, where hidden features extracted at each layer independently contribute to the final prediction, effectively capturing diverse levels of characteristic abstraction. We evaluate our approach on a Chinese literary dataset comprising over 90 k tokens derived from short, fragmented utterances, where coherent and extensive contextual information is inherently limited. Experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves a superior F1 score of 0.8224 while requiring only approximately 41% of the FLOPs compared to a conventional deep biGRU network of equivalent depth, confirming its effectiveness and efficiency for authorship identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.