Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42215605›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential therapy for salivary stimulation in postmenopausal women: a pilot study.

P Shalini Prabha, Anuradha Ganesan, Krithika Chandrasekar Lakshmi, Yesoda Aniyan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P Shalini PrabhaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SRM Dental College, Bharathi salai, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. shalinishallu40@gmail.com.
Anuradha GanesanDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology,, SRM Dental college, Bharathi Salai, Ramapuram, Chennai, India. anuradhg@srmist.edu.in.
Krithika Chandrasekar LakshmiDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SRM Dental College, Bharathi salai, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Yesoda AniyanDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SRM Dental College, Bharathi salai, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Interferential Therapy (IFT) to enhance the salivary flow rate in post-menopausal women with oral dryness. This is a randomized pilot study design where the samples were calculated based on convenience sampling method and 15 post-menopausal women aged 45 to 70 were randomly assigned to two parallel groups and Group A received TENS therapy andGroup B received IFT and the salivary flow rate of both unstimulated and stimulated saliva was measured pre and post treatment. Statistical tests including Paired t-test, independent t-test, and two-way ANOVA were carried out which reveals that both TENS and IFT are significantly effective in salivary stimulation in post-menopausal women, however only stimulated salivary flow showed a statistically significant difference between groups, with greater values in the IFT group. The present randomized pilot study demonstrated Interferential therapy's versatility and depth of stimulation, with consistent findings of improved comfort, function, and salivation, suggesting a potential advantage of IFT in stimulated salivary flow; however, because the study was a pilot, results should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseSalivaSalivationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationXerostomiaAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeInterferential therapyPost-menopausal womenTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID42215605
PMCPMC13246790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.