ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a noninvasive machine learning model using urinary extracellular vesicle physical parameters for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) are promising biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). Although novel uEV-based biomarkers have advanced early diagnosis, their detection processes remain cumbersome and cost-prohibitive. The physical parameters of uEVs offer untapped predictive potential for PCa, providing a more convenient, rapid, and cost-effective diagnostic approach. This study aims to construct a predictive model integrating uEV physical parameters with machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance the early diagnosis of PCa. Urine samples were collected from 222 eligible participants. uEVs were isolated using a commercial kit, and their concentration and size parameters were quantified via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Utilizing these physical parameters, five ML algorithms were trained and evaluated to identify the optimal diagnostic model for PCa. Model performance was systematically assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), learning curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to visualize the contributions of key predictors. Analysis of uEV physical parameters revealed that, compared to benign controls, PCa patients exhibited a significantly higher proportion of 30-150 nm uEVs and a smaller overall particle size (p < 0.001). Among the evaluated algorithms, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated superior performance. For discriminating PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the XGBoost model achieved AUC values of 0.934 and 0.864 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. DCA demonstrated that the XGBoost model yielded a higher clinical net benefit across a threshold probability range of 0-60%. Overall, the diagnostic efficacy and clinical utility of the XGBoost model significantly outperformed routine clinical parameters, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). This study successfully developed and validated a noninvasive ML-based diagnostic model utilizing the physical parameters of uEVs. This approach serves as a preliminary adjunctive tool to assist clinicians in accurately identifying prostate cancer, thereby potentially reducing the incidence of unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.