ArticleScientific reports2026
A LION-optimized GAN for multi-target battery state prediction in battery management system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting battery target variables is essential for reliable battery management, but the nonlinear and time-varying nature of batteries makes this task difficult. This study introduces GAN-LION, a conditional adversarial regression framework designed for multi-target battery prediction using historical operating sequences. Unlike traditional noise-driven GANs, the proposed model formulates prediction as a deterministic sequence-to-one regression task, where the generator predicts the next target value from a lookback window and the discriminator judges whether the input-target pair aligns with the real data distribution. To specifically examine the impact of optimization, the same adversarial architecture is trained with either the Lion or Adam optimizer and is also compared with CNN-LSTM-GRU and Autoencoder-LSTM baselines. A single end-to-end pipeline is used for preprocessing, normalization, temporal sequence construction, and chronological train-validation-test splitting to avoid information leakage. Results from two benchmark battery datasets indicate that GAN-LION achieves the strongest overall performance. Its advantage is most evident on the more challenging dataset, where it yields lower prediction errors, smoother convergence, and more stable gradient behavior. On the simpler dataset, the performance differences are less pronounced, but GAN-LION still remains competitive and stable. Overall, these results suggest that conditional adversarial regression with Lion-based optimization is an effective and technically sound method for battery target prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.