ArticleScientific reports2026
The role of biopsychosocial factors in classifying pain intensity across various chronic pain conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain catastrophizing and its associated factors among puerperal women with vaginal birth : a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is a multifaceted condition shaped by biological, psychological, and social factors, which challenges its diagnosis and treatment. While prior research largely focused on sensory profiles to distinguish pain mechanisms, this study adopted a biopsychosocial perspective with the key addition of experimental pain paradigms to identify factors explaining variance in chronic pain severity across diverse etiologies. The dataset comprised 101 individuals with chronic pain and 63 pain-free controls. Participants were classified into three groups (no pain, mild-to-moderate pain, and severe pain) using three models: a sensory-profile-based model including quantitative sensory testing (QST model), a biopsychosocial model incorporating QST alongside psychological and social variables (biopsychosocial model), and a model using the same biopsychosocial data but excluding QST measures (noQST model). The QST model achieved an accuracy of 0.51 and an F1-score of 0.48. In contrast, the biopsychosocial model performed best, with both accuracy and F1-score of 0.71, while the noQST model reached 0.60 for both metrics. Key predictors in the best-performing model included quality of life, loss of sensation, depressive mood, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, fatigue, and general health. Overall, biopsychosocial factors enhanced chronic pain severity classification beyond sensory profiles alone across heterogeneous pain etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.