ArticleNature communications2026
The benchmarking and application of tag-degraders in vivo to validate therapeutic targets.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transitioning a candidate therapeutic target from bench to bedside requires significant time and financial investment, yet clinical success remains low often due to poor on-target toxicity assessment during preclinical validation. Tag-degraders provide a tool to improve target validation by enabling degradation of any protein of interest via a degron-tag. This drug-based, reversible, and dose-dependent method of protein removal can mimic degrader-based drug treatments and assess the implications of target protein depletion in vivo. However, each degrader has a distinct pharmacokinetic profile that will influence its effectiveness across tissues. To create a resource to enable the most appropriate choice of tag-degrader, we benchmark the dTAG, HaloPROTAC, and NanoTAC systems in vivo by employing a transgenic mouse expressing a reporter protein targetable by these tag-degraders. Through various treatment regimes, we characterise each degrader profile across a panel of 20 tissues and organs, highlighting the superior degradation by dTAG molecules, and identify differences between degradation in whole tissues versus single cell populations. Using an FKBP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.