ArticleNature communications2026
Large-scale analysis of temporal gene expression variation in peripheral blood.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Blood RNA Stability Atlas: defining temporal structure and trait-state programs in the human whole-blood transcriptome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Large-scale analysis of temporal gene expression variation in peripheral blood.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood offers a promising, non-invasive approach for disease diagnosis and monitoring. However, its clinical translation is hindered by limited knowledge of the natural temporal variation. Here, we present a comprehensive reference map of longitudinal transcriptomic variability, based on RNA-sequencing of 333 healthy individuals sampled at three time points over six months. We find that 85% of genes and 99% of transcripts exhibit greater intra-individual than inter-individual variation, primarily driven by dynamic regulation of housekeeping pathways. In contrast, immune-related transcripts -particularly those linked to T and B cell activity- are strikingly stable over time. Gene expression levels drive inter-individual differences, while splicing variation contributes more to intra-individual fluctuation. In an independent twin cohort (148 monozygotic, 166 dizygotic), genes with high inter-individual variability show greater heritability, suggesting genetic control of steady-state expression. By integrating extensive clinical and environmental data, we trace temporal expression changes to genetic, compositional, and external factors, and identify robust seasonal and sex-specific signatures. These findings were validated in a third, cross-sectional cohort of 3,480 individuals. The observed temporal variation patterns have important implications for cohort-based transcriptomic analyses, as they may limit discovery and reproducibility of expression quantitative trait loci and increase the risk of spurious associations in cross-sectional studies. This resource provides a critical baseline for distinguishing disease-associated transcriptomic changes from normal physiological variation, advancing the reliability of blood-based biomarkers in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.