ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2026
Liver disease diagnostics and access barriers in African settings: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Africa, chronic liver conditions are discordantly higher due to infectious and parasitic aetiologies, especially viral hepatitis. Early diagnosis is a linchpin for successful management and improved outcomes; however, diagnostic power is extremely limited. Yet, profound gaps compromise every step of the diagnostic continuum. Histopathological evaluation through liver biopsy remains the gold standard for establishing aetiology, grading inflammation and staging fibrosis. Biopsy services in Africa are limited by limited infrastructure, a deficit of qualified professionals, substantial costs, unreliable tissue samples and limited access to advanced pathology techniques such as immunohistochemistry and molecular testing. Non-invasive diagnostic tools such as serum markers, transient elastography and imaging techniques are unequally accessible, poorly updated for African-specific aetiologies and largely inaccessible outside tertiary centres. This review explores the aetiological spectrum of chronic liver disease in Africa and evaluates the availability and performance of both histological and non-invasive diagnostic techniques. This review illustrates gaps affecting screening, staging, initiation of management and hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. Addressing these diagnostic limitations through improved infrastructure, expanded professional training and local validation of non-invasive tools is essential to reducing the burden of liver disease across Africa. In addition, it offers tiered and feasible recommendations while considering the current reality of healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.