Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42214407›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2026

Efficacy and safety of a 4-month quabodepistat, delamanid, and bedaquiline regimen for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, proof-of-concept, non-inferiority, phase 2b/c trial.

Rodney Dawson, Andreas H Diacon, Ebrahim Variava, Tumelo Moloantoa, William Brumskine, Tlhago Ngwanto, Ntokozo Zuma-Gwala, Ayman Osman, Mohammed Rassool, Jaclyn Ann Bennet and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221502 (A Multicenter, Phase 2b/c, Open-label, Randomized, Dose-finding Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a 4 Month Regimen of OPC-167832 in Combination With Delamanid and Bedaquiline in Subjects With Drug-susceptible Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Comparison With Standard Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05221502 phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Phase 2b/c, Open-label, Randomized, Dose-finding Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a 4 Month Regimen of OPC-167832 in Combination With Delamanid and Bedaquiline in Subjects With Drug-susceptible Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Comparison With Standard Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled122ConditionsPulmonary TBArmsDelamanid, Bedaquiline, RHEZ, Rifampin, Isoniazid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rodney DawsonDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andreas H DiaconTASK, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ebrahim VariavaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, Tshepong Hospital Complex, Klerksdorp, South Africa; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Soweto, South Africa.
Tumelo MoloantoaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, Soweto, South Africa.
William BrumskineThe Aurum Institute NPC, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tlhago NgwantoThe Aurum Institute NPC, Gauteng, South Africa.
Ntokozo Zuma-GwalaSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Ayman OsmanSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mohammed RassoolClinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jaclyn Ann BennetClinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Yongge LiuOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Rockville, MD, USA.
Raymond XuOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Rockville, MD, USA.
Wei LiOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Rockville, MD, USA.
Simbarashe TakuvaOtsuka Novel Products, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: stakuva@otsuka-onpg.com.
Jeffrey HafkinOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Rockville, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined therapy with delamanid, bedaquiline, and quabodepistat (DBQ) showed potent early bactericidal activity and was well tolerated in a phase 2a, 14-day early bactericidal activity trial in participants with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. This subsequent proof-of-concept trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 4-month, three-dose level regimen of DBQ in participants with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis compared with 6 months of the standard of care.

methodsThis open-label, randomised, proof-of-concept, non-inferiority, phase 2b/c trial was conducted at six clinical research sites in South Africa. Adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis were recruited by research sites from community tuberculosis clinics. Participants were randomly assigned (1:2:2:1) by balanced block randomisation (block size six) to receive oral delamanid (300 mg once a day) and bedaquiline (400 mg once a day for 2 weeks then 200 mg three times a week) plus quabodepistat at once-daily doses of 10 mg (DBQ10 group), 30 mg (DBQ30 group), or 90 mg (DBQ90 group) for 4 months; or 6 months of RHEZ (rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide for 8 weeks followed by 18 weeks of rifampin and isoniazid). All drugs were administered orally. Masking procedures were not used, although microbiology laboratory staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of participants reaching sputum culture conversion by the end of the treatment period in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis set and safety in the safety analysis set. Non-inferiority, with a margin of 12%, was assessed for the primary endpoint in the mITT analysis set, comparing the pooled DBQ group and the RHEZ group using a two-sided 80% CI. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05221502, and is complete.

findingsBetween April 12, 2022, and May 19, 2024, 306 individuals were screened, of whom 122 were enrolled and randomly assigned: 20 to the DBQ10 group, 42 to the DBQ30 group, 39 to the DBQ90 group, and 21 to the RHEZ group. 121 participants received at least one dose of study drug and comprised the mITT analysis set. At the end of the treatment period, the proportion of participants with sputum culture conversion was 100·0% (95% CI 83·2-100·0, all 20 participants) in the DBQ10 group, 92·9% (80·5-98·5, 39 of 42 participants) in the DBQ30 group, 97·4% (86·2-99·9, 37 of 38 participants) in the DBQ90 group, 96·0% (90·1-98·9, 96 of 100 participants) in the pooled DBQ group, and 100·0% (83·9-100·0, all 21 participants) in the RHEZ group. The comparison between the pooled DBQ group and the RHEZ group met non-inferiority for the primary endpoint (difference -4·0% [80% CI -7·4 to 3·4]). Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations attributed to trial medications. Rates of adverse events of grade 3 or higher were 20% (four of 20 participants) in the DBQ10 group, 14% (six of 42 participants) in the DBQ30 group, 11% (four of 38 participants) in the DBQ90 group, and 5% (one of 21 participants) in the RHEZ group. One participant (in the DBQ90 group) died after worsening pulmonary tuberculosis with pneumonia, which was assessed as not related to study treatment. 105 (87%) of 121 participants had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event: 17 (85%) of 20 in the DBQ10 group, 37 (88%) of 42 in the DBQ30 group, 30 (79%) of 38 in the DBQ90 group, and all 21 (100%) participants in the RHEZ group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the total population of 121 participants were upper respiratory tract infection (n=36, 30%), headache (n=24, 20%), and diarrhoea (n=12, 10%).

interpretationIn this proof-of-concept study, 4 months of DBQ showed a promising end-of-treatment non-inferiority signal versus 6 months of RHEZ and was generally well tolerated. Our results support further studies of quabodepistat as a potential component of new treatment-shortening regimens for tuberculosis.

fundingOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, with partial funding from the Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDiarylquinolinesNitroimidazolesOxazolesTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdolescentAdultAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsbedaquilineDiarylquinolinesNitroimidazolesOPC-67683Oxazoles

Identifiers

PMID42214407
PMCPMC13601027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.