ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Tailoring pedagogical methods to enhance student engagement through a student-faculty partnership in an undergraduate immunology course.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Getting real-time feedback on pedagogical methods used in the classroom can be a challenge due to a variety of reasons, including the classroom format, instructor lecturing styles, as well as weariness of students to engage instructors. However, a structured semester-long student-faculty partnership can serve as a powerful tool to enhance teaching effectiveness and student engagement. We describe here our version of a student-faculty partnership program (SFPP) model in an upper-level undergraduate Immunology course where a student from a non-science major was embedded in the course to observe classroom dynamics between students and instructor and provide formative feedback to the instructor throughout the semester. This collaboration led to several pedagogical adjustments suggested by the student-partner, including increased use of flipped classroom sessions, integration of lab experiments within lecture sessions, and the use of interactive tools, such as clickers for concept reinforcement and game apps for exam reviews. As a result, the course section implementing the SFPP model had high engagement in lectures and labs, increased performance on lab assignment submitted, and better satisfaction with the revised course format. The end of the semester student surveys and comments indicated student enthusiasm and comfort with the course content as a result of the revised instructional strategies. Thus, the SFPP model offers an adaptable approach for instructors seeking to create a more responsive, real-time, and student-centered learning environment in immunology and biology education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.