ArticleGigaScience2026
EEG-based dataset explicitly targets the transitions between sitting and standing for exploring neural activation patterns in motor imagery and execution.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the first publicly accessible electroencephalography (EEG) dataset explicitly targeting sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions during both motor execution (ME) and motor imagery (MI) tasks. Twenty-two healthy participants performed sitting and standing transitions under well-controlled experimental conditions while 60-channel EEG, electrooculography (EOG), and electromyography (EMG) signals were synchronously recorded. The dataset enables the exploration of neural activation patterns associated with lower-limb movements and supports the development of EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) algorithms for mobility assistance and rehabilitation. To validate the dataset, benchmark classification was conducted on three baseline deep learning methods-CTNet, EEGNet, and TCANet. Given the high inter-subject variability inherent to EEG, leave-one-subject-out cross-validation is used to ensure no subject bias during evaluation. Results demonstrated consistent decoding performance with mean accuracies of approximately 81% for ME and 73% for MI, indicating the reliability and usability of the dataset. Additionally, analyses of movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) patterns revealed distinct neural signatures across the transition phases. This dataset provides a comprehensive foundation for studying lower-limb motor control, neural dynamics, and the advancement of MI-based BCIs for rehabilitation and assistive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.