ArticlePoultry science2026
Effects of oleic acid supplementation on ileal fatty acid digestibility, intestinal barrier function, and cecal microbiota in Pekin ducks fed a high-fat diet.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of a diet supplemented with oleic acid (OA) on apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of fatty acids, intestinal barrier function, and the cecal microbiota as well as its metabolites in Pekin ducks fed a high-fat diet (HFD). A total of 240 male ducks (14 d of age) were randomly assigned to three groups: control group (Con), high-fat diet (HFD), and the HFD plus 0.50% OA (HFD_OA). The experimental duration was 28 days. Results demonstrated that HFD significantly decreased the AID of ether extract and palmitic acid (P < 0.05), whereas OA supplementation effectively restored these levels and further increased the AID of total saturated fatty acids (SFAs) (P < 0.05), which led to a decreased flow of unabsorbed SFAs at the terminal ileum. Meanwhile, OA reinforced the intestinal epithelial barrier by decreasing endotoxin concentrations in both serum and ileal mucosa (P < 0.05) and upregulating the mRNA expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins (Occludin, Claudin-1, and ZO-1) and lysozyme (LYZ), along with suppressing MLCK mRNA expression (P < 0.05). Moreover, OA intervention specifically enriched the abundance of Parabacteroides and significantly increased the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis further revealed that Parabacteroides enrichment was positively correlated with LYZ mRNA expression and SCFA production (P < 0.05) and was negatively correlated with serum endotoxin levels. These results suggest that OA enhances proximal assimilation of SFAs to reduce hindgut lipid overload, thereby ameliorating dysbiosis, suppressing endotoxin concentrations in both serum and ileal mucosa, and restoring TJs to reverse HFD-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction in Pekin ducks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.