Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42214154›Full record

Trial reportBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026

Tumor flare-like response: A novel imaging phenomenon with predictive significance in triple negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy.

Bing Jie Zheng, Cheng Zheng Wang, Ho-Young Song, Wen Juan Xu, Ren Zhi Zhang, Jin Rong Qu, Chun Miao Xu, Xia Yu Yue, Jia Yu Wang, Yu Chen and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04213898 (SHR-1210 Combined With Albumin-bound Paclitaxel and Epirubicin Neoadjuvant for Triple Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04213898 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

SHR-1210 Combined With Albumin-bound Paclitaxel and Epirubicin Neoadjuvant for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenan Cancer HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsTriple-negative Breast CancerArmsSHR-1210+Albumin-bound paclitaxel + epirubicin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bing Jie ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Electronic address: zlyyzbj2100@zzu.edu.cn.
Cheng Zheng WangDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ho-Young SongDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Wen Juan XuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, China.
Ren Zhi ZhangDiagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jin Rong QuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Chun Miao XuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xia Yu YueDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Jia Yu WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ming Ge LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Cong Yu LiDepartment of Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ya Fei ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Quan Li GaoDepartment of Immunotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xue Jun ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhen Zhen LiuDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative immuno-chemotherapy improves outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer, but associated imaging response patterns remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to describe a novel MRI phenomenon, tumor flare-like response (TFLR), and evaluate its association with pathological complete response (pCR).

methodsAd hoc imaging analysis of a prospective phase II trial (NCT04213898; n = 39). Breast MRI was performed at baseline and after every two cycles. TFLR was defined a priori as new enhancing nodules (≥5 mm) separate from the index tumor on DCE-MRI, appearing during neoadjuvant therapy with subsequent regression. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Univariate logistic regression and ROC analysis (Youden index) with 1000-bootstrap resampling identified the optimal largest-nodule size cut-off for pCR prediction. Two multivariable logistic regression models (continuous-size and binary-size) evaluated independence after adjustment for PD-L1 status, FGT category, baseline tumor size, and clinical stage; multicollinearity was assessed by variance inflation factor.

resultsTFLR occurred in 74.4% (29/39) of patients and was significantly associated with higher FGT density (P = .03). Among the 29 patients with TFLR, nodules were predominantly oval (93.1%) with circumscribed margins, homogeneous enhancement. Distribution was bilateral (72.5%), ipsilateral (17.2%), or contralateral (10.3%) relative to the primary tumor, with consistently asymmetric counts between breasts. Kinetic curves were persistent (31.0%), plateau (27.6%), or washout (41.4%). TFLR first appeared after cycle 2 in all cases and completely resolved in 75.9% (22/29) by treatment completion; median persistence was 152 days (95% CI 145-159). Presence of TFLR alone did not predict pCR (P = .72). Patients with largest nodule ≥9 mm had significantly higher pCR rate (77.8% vs. 36.4%, P = .048). ROC analysis identified 9 mm as the optimal cut-off. In multivariable analysis, largest nodule diameter remained independently predictive whether analyzed continuously (OR = 2.965, 95% CI 1.298-6.772, P = .01) or dichotomized at ≥9 mm (OR = 7.833, 95% CI 1.260-48.701, P = .027). Model AUCs were 0.904 (95% CI 0.797-1.00) and 0.727 (95% CI 0.519-0.936), respectively.

conclusionsTFLR is a frequent, reversible MRI finding in TNBC treated with camrelizumab-based neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy. Largest nodule diameter ≥9 mm is a strong, independent predictor of pathological complete response and represents a promising early, non-invasive imaging biomarker of immunotherapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerImmune checkpoint inhibitorNeoadjuvantPathologic complete response

Identifiers

PMID42214154
PMCPMC13241967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.