Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42214051›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

Assessing the Success Rate and Costs of Common Recruitment Strategies for a Community-Based Environmental Health Study.

Amber M Vaughn, Micaela Gale, Deanna Kulbeth, Noah Featherman, Hannah Craig, Shelby Kardel, Brent M Windebank, Chandler Webb, John L Adgate, Greta Wilkening and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amber M VaughnAuthor Affiliations: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Vaughn, Mrs Gale, Ms Kulbeth, Mr Featherman, Mrs Craig, Ms Kardel, Mr Windebank, Mr Webb, and Dr Adgate); Department of Pediatrics-Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Wilkening); Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Starling); Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Dr Starling).ORCID 0000-0001-8496-8198
Brent M Windebank
Chandler Webb
John L Adgate
Anne P Starling

Funding

ATSDR CDC HHS U01 TS000300ATSDR CDC HHS U01TS000300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRecruitment is a vital component of public health research to produce generalizable findings and analytical power for subgroup differences in health outcomes. Recruitment strategies in population-based health studies vary widely with limited information on response rates and expected costs.

objectivesTo evaluate recruitment strategies to better inform future recruitment planning and practices based on response rates, implementation costs, and demographics of enrolled participants.

designWe cross-sectionally examined recruitment data from the Colorado Study on Community Outcomes from Per- and polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposure (CO SCOPE). Passive strategies included announcements and word-of-mouth referrals; active strategies included in-person outreach via door-to-door canvassing and/or tabling at community events, and phone or email contact to participants from a previous study. We calculated response rates per population reached by each strategy and estimated costs of materials and staff time. SETTING AND

participantsIn 2021-2023, we recruited and enrolled participants from 4 communities in El Paso County, Colorado. This site was part of a national multisite study of exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in drinking water and associated health effects. We enrolled 916 adult participants (92% of our goal).

resultsOverall participant response rate across all strategies was 0.5%. Response rates were lowest after announcements (0.1%), and highest from direct contact with previous study participants (32.3%). In-person outreach accrued the greatest number of enrolled participants but also at the highest estimated cost ($242/enrolled participant). Word-of-mouth referrals recruited the greatest proportions of young adults (aged 18-34) and people with a high school education or less. Ultimately, the enrolled study population over-represented older adults, women, and non-Hispanic White people compared with the target communities.

conclusionsRecruitment strategies differed substantially in response rates and cost effectiveness. Word-of-mouth referrals and in-person outreach were most successful in recruiting diverse populations.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthPatient SelectionAdultColoradoCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedactive recruitmentpassive recruitmentrecruitmentrecruitment cost estimationresponse rate

Identifiers

PMID42214051
PMCPMC13596189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.