Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213897›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2026

Experiences and Perceptions Within a Co-Created Drone Transport Initiative With Rural First Nation and Non-First Nation Communities: Semistructured Interview Study.

Audrey Warner, Sandy Lee, John Pawlovich, Terri-Leigh Aldred, Michael Allard, Dave Christie, Alison James, Dave Kang, Kimia Nouhi, Larry D Lynd and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Audrey WarnerDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-5413
Sandy LeeDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2315-1480
John PawlovichDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-0685
Terri-Leigh AldredDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-1146
Michael AllardDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-9743
Dave ChristieVillage of Fraser Lake, Fraser Lake, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1136-1703
Alison JamesRural Coordination Centre of BC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6177-9945
Dave KangSobeys, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6417-4501
Kimia NouhiDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5920-8433
Larry D LyndFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-3919
Robert MichellStellat'en First Nation, Stellako, British Columbia, Canada.
Adam PatrickStellat'en First Nation, Stellako, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5696-6685
Edward RatnarajahThrive Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7734-3402
Anurag SinghDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0497-5771
Sarrah StoreyVillage of Fraser Lake, Fraser Lake, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4822-1511
Femke HoekstraCentre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V 1V7, Canada, 1 250 807 8876.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-652X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People living in rural areas of British Columbia experience inequities in access to health care that impact health and well-being. Since time immemorial, Indigenous peoples have had a holistic understanding of health and wellness, and knowledge of healthful ways of living. However, in a rural context, Indigenous peoples contend not only with inequitable access to health care, but also with the historical and ongoing impacts of colonization. Virtual health innovations enable access to care closer to home, yet the need for diagnostic tests and essential medicines remains limited by supply chains. In this context, transport of medical supplies by drone offers a promising solution and has the potential to improve access to health care in rural and First Nations communities in British Columbia. Objective: The Drone Transport Initiative is a co-created health care innovation project between the Stellat'en First Nation, the Village of Fraser Lake, the University of British Columbia, and other health system partners that investigated the feasibility of drones to transport medical supplies in a rural British Columbian context. This analysis aimed to understand the experiences and perceptions of the Project Team, people directly involved in the Initiative. Methods: Twenty members of the Project Team, including representatives from the Steering Committee and Operational Team having diverse roles within the project, participated in semistructured interviews. Eleven interviews were conducted either individually (n=5), in pairs (n=5), or in a group of 5 (n=1). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to understand the Project Team's experiences and perceptions of the project. Initial results were shared with coauthors, including project cosponsors and community members, to interpret the findings and formulate discussion topics. Results: Participants generally expressed positive experiences from being part of the Drone Transport Initiative, despite remarking on various challenges. Major themes derived from the analysis centered upon (1) building respectful and trusting relationships, (2) mutual benefits that enabled effective and engaged partnerships, (3) meaningful community engagement that facilitated community acceptance and ownership of the project, and (4) this project is "the first step of something big." Themes were further divided into subthemes characterized as processes or outcomes. Conclusions: In this work, we highlight a health innovation project grounded in relational approaches and partnerships, where rural and First Nations communities are champions of advancing their development goals and co-creating solutions that address key social determinants of health. We contribute to the literature by emphasizing the relational foundation that is necessary at the cutting edge of innovation to co-create, implement, and sustain drone projects with rural and First Nations communities.

Indexed as

community engagementFirst Nationshealth care accesshealth care innovationIndigenousruraltechnology

Identifiers

PMID42213897
PMCPMC13220978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.