ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Clinical markers of disease progression in the prodromal to overt alpha-synucleinopathy continuum.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical progression from prodromal to overt stages of alpha-synucleinopathies is highly heterogeneous, and there is an urgent need for reliable clinical progression markers. Exploiting the Disease Course Mapping (DCM) model, we investigated how clinical signs evolve in patients with idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD), extracting clinical progression measures for use at the single-subject level. Furthermore, we correlated them with both established and innovative neurodegeneration biomarkers. We trained a DCM model using cognitive and motor scores of a longitudinal cohort of 766 patients with iRBD (166 female, 67.9 ± 7.4 years). We personalized the model by extracting three parameters to describe the single subject in comparison to the averaged population data. We tested the model on a blind set of 49 patients with iRBD (seven female, 68.5 ± 7.1 years) who underwent both longitudinal clinical evaluations and instrumental evaluation at the first observation. In the blind set, we correlated the individual model parameters with presynaptic dopaminergic impairment, an established biomarker of substantia nigra neurodegeneration, and cortical electrophysiological dysfunction-measured by high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG)-an innovative neurodegeneration biomarker. We identified three individual clinical markers reflecting early/late (time-shift, τ) and fast/slow (acceleration factor, α) disease progression, as well as the individual clinical trajectory (i.e. earlier motor or cognitive impairment, intermarker spacing, ω). The individual model parameters are significantly associated with phenoconversion, with a 73% chance of distinguishing between clinically stable patients (non-converters) and those converting during the longitudinal observation to an overt alpha-synucleinopathy (converters). Motor scores progress 35% faster than cognitive scores in our iRBD cohort. Converter iRBD patients exhibited a faster and earlier disease progression than non-converters, and on average, they showed an earlier worsening of motor scores than cognitive scores, regardless of the clinical diagnosis of overt parkinsonism. Patients with iRBD who developed parkinsonism worsened earlier than those who developed dementia. At baseline, an earlier progression was related to presynaptic dopaminergic impairment and higher phase synchronization in the theta band (4-8 Hz). Higher synchronization in the theta band was also associated with an earlier worsening of motor scores than cognitive scores. In this study, we investigated a large longitudinal iRBD cohort, applying an advanced disease progression model. We found three individual clinical markers that were able to monitor disease progression and showed significant association with both established and innovative neurodegeneration biomarkers. We suggest that these clinical markers could be used as efficacy end points in disease-modifying clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.