ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2026
Diminished Performance and Learning of a Novel Visuomotor Skill in Children Born Preterm.
Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Premature infants face another serious problem: eye movements are abnormal.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Premature birth has long-term effects on sensory, motor, and cognitive development. Despite evidence of impaired motor function in young children born preterm, there is less known about motor learning and the characterization of the acquisition and retention of motor skills in this population. Furthermore, bimanual movements, important for performing everyday activities, may be preferentially affected in preterm children. In this study, we compared unimanual and bimanual motor skill learning in young children born preterm compared to children born at term age. Unimanual and bimanual de novo visuomotor learning tasks were implemented on a computerized tablet (Apple iPad). Fifty-five participants (N = 14 preterm), corrected age 5-8 years, completed three testing sessions: initial practice (72 practice attempts), 24-h retention (24 practice attempts), and 7-day retention (24 practice attempts). Speed (completion time) and accuracy (movement path length) characterized motor performance. Learning was determined by comparing performance at the end of initial practice to each retention test. Overall, preterm children exhibited reduced speed and accuracy on both tasks compared to term-born children. All children performed better on the unimanual version of the task. Retention was similar between groups and tasks. Biological age had a small, nonlinear relationship with performance. These results confirm that preterm children have impaired unimanual and bimanual skills but are capable of learning new visuomotor patterns, with potential differences in skill retention. This evidence provides insight into the varied trajectories of motor development of preterm children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.