Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A grasp point generation algorithm for waste handling based on a generative reasoning network.

Xiao Xiao, Deyu Liu, Hai Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao XiaoSchool of Electrical Engineering, Hunan Industry Polytechnic, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Deyu LiuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Hunan Industry Polytechnic, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Hai QinSchool of Electronic Information, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-4039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of urban kitchen waste sorting, robots often encounter issues such as slipping and empty grabs when attempting to grasp dirty waste objects like plastic bottles and glass bottles. This paper proposes a garbage grasping framework based on the Channel Exchange Generative Residual Inference Network (CE-GR-NET), which synthesizes optimal grasping trajectories through the fusion of hierarchical visual features. The object detection network identifies and locates recyclable bottles among solid waste, while CE-GR-NET uses RGB and depth images to generate grasping points for plastic recyclable bottles. Experimental results show that, on the Cornell Grasping Dataset, the proposed method achieves good inference performance and fast inference speed in single-object solid waste scenarios, ultimately generating grasping boxes for plastic recyclable bottles in RGB images. On the self-constructed multi-source urban kitchen waste images, the proposed method generates grasping boxes for targets and regresses the corresponding object categories simultaneously, achieving an image-based model accuracy of 96.03%, an object-based model accuracy of 94.40%, and a grasping object classification accuracy of 97.87%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsWaste ManagementDetection AlgorithmsRecyclingRoboticsSolid WasteSolid Waste

Identifiers

PMID42213813
PMCPMC13221080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.