ArticlePloS one2026
Participant lived experiences of high-intensity interval training in UK cardiac rehabilitation (HIIT or MISS UK): A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExercise programmes are an important component of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR). High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional moderate intensity steady state (MISS) exercise. In the 'HIIT or MISS UK' trial, low-volume HIIT was safe, and clinically and cost effective. However, there is a lack of insight into the lived experiences of those who engage in non-conventional approaches to CR exercise training. The aim of this research was to explore the benefits and challenges associated with HIIT and MISS in CR. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative descriptive methodology was adopted to document participant lived experiences. Participants were purposefully recruited from two 'HIIT or MISS UK' trial CR centres. After consent, participants took part in semi-structured interviews conducted via Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies (e.g., Microsoft Teams (MT), Skype or Zoom). A critical realist approach to inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
findings19 people took part (8 MISS and 11 HIIT; male 18 [95%]; age 59.6 years [SD 10.4]). Analysis revealed a range of perceived psychosocial (e.g., enjoyment, confidence, purpose) and physiological (e.g., weight loss, increased fitness) benefits that were present across both groups (i.e., HIIT and MISS). Participants in both groups identified challenges, for example, a need for exercise to continue beyond what was offered in the trial. There were notable differences across the groups, namely HIIT participants enjoyed feeling challenged, yet grappled with feelings of monotony, whilst MISS participants experienced increased social interaction.
conclusionHIIT in CR offered a range of perceived psychosocial and physiological benefits. Integrating more opportunities for social interaction into the HIIT program could enhance participant experience. Practitioners could investigate the feasibility of support for patients after CR has finished.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.