ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026
Simultaneous Cortical Responses to Multiple Written Words.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have learned much about the brain regions that support reading by measuring neuronal responses to single words, but we know little about how the brain processes multiple words simultaneously. This fMRI study fills that gap by varying the number of English words presented while holding the amount of visual stimulation constant. We adapted the "simultaneous suppression" paradigm, which has demonstrated that the response to multiple stimuli presented simultaneously is typically smaller than the sum of responses to the same stimuli presented sequentially. On each trial, participants viewed a rapid sequence of three frames. Each frame contained two character strings, most of which were pseudoletters with visual features matched to familiar letters. The experimental conditions differed in the number of words in the sequence: zero words, one word, two words sequentially, or two words simultaneously. Behavioral task accuracy was worse for detecting two words presented simultaneously than sequentially. BOLD responses increased linearly with the number of words presented in several reading-related regions of the left hemisphere: text-selective occipito-temporal regions, the STS, the intraparietal sulcus, and the inferior frontal sulcus. In all of those regions, responses did not differ between sequential and simultaneous presentation of two words. Nonetheless, the sensitivity of ventral temporal text-selective regions to the lexical frequencies of two words was attenuated by simultaneous presentation. To account for these patterns of activity and task performance, we suggest that the reading network can detect two strings of letters simultaneously, but there is interference during lexical access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.