ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026
Retrieval-related Eye Movements Are Predictive of Memory Precision.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movements are predictive of successful episodic memory encoding and retrieval, but it is unclear whether they reflect the precision of retrieved memory content. Here, we examined relationships between eye fixations, memory precision, and fMRI BOLD activity. At study, participants were presented with object images, each placed at a random location on a circle. At test, both studied and new images were presented. Participants were instructed to recall and signal the studied location of each image, guessing if necessary. They then indicated if the image had been studied. Simultaneous fMRI and eye-tracking data were acquired during the test phase. For correctly recognized images, trial-wise angular distances between the studied and reported locations were fitted to a two-component mixture model. On the basis of model-derived parameters, correctly recognized images were categorized as those associated with successful location retrieval (location hits) or guesses. Location hits were further divided into high- and low-precision trials. At retrieval, fixation location predicted both successful retrieval and the precision of the retrieved location memory. In addition, across-trial fixation patterns were more similar for location hits than for guesses and for high- than for low-precision trials. The association between retrieval success and fixation precision was evident across almost the entire recall phase, whereas memory precision effects emerged around 1-1.5 sec after image onset. Fixation precision and pattern similarity each predicted trial-wise memory precision independently of hippocampal BOLD activity, which also predicted memory precision. Taken together, the findings indicate that eye movements during retrieval track the fidelity of retrieved mnemonic content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.