Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213517›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026

Retrieval-related Eye Movements Are Predictive of Memory Precision.

Mingzhu Hou, Luke R Pezanko, Sabina Srokova, Paul F Hill, Arne D Ekstrom, Michael D Rugg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingzhu HouThe University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0001-8798-8477
Luke R PezankoThe University of Texas at Dallas.
Sabina SrokovaUniversity of Arizona.
Paul F HillUniversity of Arizona.
Arne D EkstromUniversity of Arizona.
Michael D RuggThe University of Texas at Dallas.

Funding

Precision and binding as two dimensions of medial temporal lobe amnesiaR01NS114913 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D, YONELINAS, ANDREW P · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114913NINDS NIH HHS R01NS114913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movements are predictive of successful episodic memory encoding and retrieval, but it is unclear whether they reflect the precision of retrieved memory content. Here, we examined relationships between eye fixations, memory precision, and fMRI BOLD activity. At study, participants were presented with object images, each placed at a random location on a circle. At test, both studied and new images were presented. Participants were instructed to recall and signal the studied location of each image, guessing if necessary. They then indicated if the image had been studied. Simultaneous fMRI and eye-tracking data were acquired during the test phase. For correctly recognized images, trial-wise angular distances between the studied and reported locations were fitted to a two-component mixture model. On the basis of model-derived parameters, correctly recognized images were categorized as those associated with successful location retrieval (location hits) or guesses. Location hits were further divided into high- and low-precision trials. At retrieval, fixation location predicted both successful retrieval and the precision of the retrieved location memory. In addition, across-trial fixation patterns were more similar for location hits than for guesses and for high- than for low-precision trials. The association between retrieval success and fixation precision was evident across almost the entire recall phase, whereas memory precision effects emerged around 1-1.5 sec after image onset. Fixation precision and pattern similarity each predicted trial-wise memory precision independently of hippocampal BOLD activity, which also predicted memory precision. Taken together, the findings indicate that eye movements during retrieval track the fidelity of retrieved mnemonic content.

Indexed as

BrainEye MovementsMental RecallAdultBrain MappingEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleFixation, OcularHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationYoung AdultOxygen

Identifiers

PMID42213517
PMCPMC13569477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.