ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2026
Venous vascular pharmacology: how does it contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment effects in contemporary cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: determinants and interpretation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally. Despite significant research, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this complex condition remain poorly defined. Recently, the venous system has emerged as an underrecognized yet critical contributor to HFpEF pathogenesis, functioning as the primary capacitance system and a determinant of central venous pressure. Evidence suggests an imbalance between endothelial-derived relaxing and contractile factors (EDRF/EDCF), leading to venous endothelial dysfunction, elevated venous tone, and increased mean circulatory filling pressure, all factors that contribute to ventricular-vascular mismatch. This review synthesizes current literature on the vasoactive effects of EDRF and EDCF in the venous vs. arterial systems, in both preclinical and clinical models, and examines how HFpEF therapies may target these pathways. While preclinical models demonstrate the vasoactivity of these mediators in veins of healthy and hypertensive animals, studies investigating its effects in validated HFpEF models are lacking, prompting further research. Furthermore, clinical studies should also prioritize functional assessments and venous-specific endpoints, including direct measures of venous compliance, to better guide therapeutic strategies for HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.