Trial reportJAMA network open2026
A Staff-Directed Electronic Medical Record Alert to Increase Chlamydia Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03246815 (STD Testing in Outpatient Practices-The STOP STDs Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
STD Testing in Outpatient Practices-The STOP STDs Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Chlamydia is the most commonly reported sexually transmitted disease (STD) in the US. Screening sexually active females 24 years or younger is recommended to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae; however, screening remains suboptimal. Objective: To assess whether an automated electronic medical record alert directed at medical assistants who are preparing patients for office visits increases chlamydia screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: The STD Testing in Outpatient Practices (STOP STDs) Study was a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from August 2017 to November 2019 (data analyzed from August 2022 to July 2023). The study included medical staff in primary care and obstetrics-gynecology offices across western Pennsylvania. Interventions: Offices were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a real-time electronic alert or usual care. The alert activated for female patients without chlamydia screening within the past year. Medical assistants received the alert while preparing patients for their visit in an examination room. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the number of chlamydia tests ordered analyzed using constrained difference-in-differences mixed-effects logistic regression with random intercepts for practice and patient; no additional covariates were included. Results: There were 7356 encounters in primary care and 10 672 in obstetrics-gynecology (women aged 18-24 years). Chlamydia tests were more frequently ordered among patients in primary care practices randomized to the alert (497 of 3770 [13.2%]) than in control practices (135 of 3586 [3.8%]). After adjusting for baseline differences in chlamydia screening in practices, the alert was associated with an increase in test orders compared with the control group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.74; 95% CI, 1.94-3.88). The alert was associated with testing in the intervention group for reproductive health-related visits (AOR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.70-4.62) and for other medical reasons (AOR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.78-4.85). The alert did not affect screening in obstetrics-gynecology practices. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of chlamydia screening, an alert directed to medical assistants was associated with increased odds of a test ordered in primary care practices. This study's results suggest that an alert could increase the proportion of women screened for chlamydia and reduce the reproductive sequelae of this common STD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246815.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.