ArticleCytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology2026
Cytopathology Terminology Systems: European Federation of Cytological Societies Survey on Practice in Europe.
Article in Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cytopathology Terminology Systems: European Federation of Cytological Societies Survey on Practice in Europe.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytopathologists communicate with clinicians via cytopathology reports. For decades Papanicolaou Classes (Pap Classes), descriptive reports or surgical pathology terminologies have been used. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology has been the first organ-specific terminology system and since 2010, there has been a plethora of new reporting terminology systems. We aimed to map the implementation of reporting systems via a survey designed and led by the Scientific Committee of European Federation of Cytological Societies. The survey was available online between May 2022 and May 2023. For each classification, respondents were asked whether each was implemented, barriers to implementation and if there were data on national validation of the system. A total of 37 countries participated. Department-level implementation decision was the most reported (81.6%) with a strong involvement of national cytology societies. 65.8% of respondents indicated that Pap Classes were used prior to organ-specific terminologies and 60.5% of respondents used descriptive-only text prior to organ-specific terminologies. Overall half of the respondents used national or local systems (50.0%). The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology and the Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology have been implemented by most of the responding countries (92.1% and 94.7%, respectively). Overall, the most reported barriers to implementing terminologies were a lack of awareness of the details of the terminology (44.7%) and the difficulty in implementing the terminology (34.2%). Despite the variabilities in practices, regulations and legislations, cytopathology reporting systems are widely accepted and implemented in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.